The hero was not my favorite. The first thing he dose when encountering the heroin in a deserted hallway is kiss her. Which just goes to show that hes not a true gentlemen. Still I continued reading because I liked the heroin and things mostly got better. He was pretty much a clod but he really loved her so when they ended up together at the end I was okay with it.
I very much enjoyed reading this book. Although the hero did a few things that I felt were not romantic. I have trouble when hero's are not someone that I would envision trusting my daughter or best friend to but overall he proved to be a good person so I can forgive a little bad behavior.
I very much enjoyed the first one of the Healer series and because the first book didn't really resolve everything I started this one. I could not put it down, there were very few lulls and I never felt as if I could take a breath. Every chapter ended on a cliffhanger. It was very much like reading a thriller. Each chapter alternates between two narrators, one in first person, and the next one in third person, and although I understand the authors reasons for choosing to write the story this way I was a little thrown every time it happened.
This goes to show how sexist I really am but I would not have known from the writing style that the female lead character was written by a guy. On par with Terry Pratchett in how real her thoughts and feelings are. So often when men write girls they make us one dimensional, and stupid. I have a hard time not getting angry when the main character can't find her way out of a paper bag.
I was wandering my library shelves when I found this book. What drew me wast the fact that it was about Jane Austen but was written by a man. I have never heard more disparaging comments about Jane Austen than from men who have never read her work. I took it home and was completely sucked in. In fact I started over at the beginning as started reading it allowed to my mother. She too was fascinated.
I really agree with the basic idea of the authors about how a base of knowledge for a child will help them in life. I really feel that if I have been given a better education I would have a lot easier time with life. But as usual I disagree with many of the specifics the author feels are essential. Not a book that I feel I would use as a whole but parts of it are valuable.
This is the book my mother used to teach me how to read. Well actually its the 1973 edition but I couldn't find that on here. I was reading it to see if when my child is old enough if it would be useful, and I believe it would be. Hes fairly old fashioned. Not too surprising. He was old when he wrote it in the 70's.
Initially I thought this book looked good. I liked the explanations about words and sounds. In fact I learned quite a lot from reading the later pages. But after starting at the beginning and going through the teaching method I decided that it might be useful to someone trying to teach a child as an adjunct but not as a whole program. The beginning worksheet exercises are fine but the pages are very busy with cartoons and cutesy phrases on the sides that a child who is learning to read would need someone to read to them, and have nothing to do with the worksheets. The book also focuses on games. No amount of games and 'fun' are going to inspire a child to learn to read fluently. Reading is intrinsically the goal of learning to read. Knowing whats on a page and what it means is what a child needs to be 'rewarded' by. Not outside rewards and game's that will be immediately taken away once the child learns to read.
My mom and I picked this book up on a whim at our local used bookstore because we laughed when we read the first couple pages. The writing style is great.
This book has tons of information that is backed up with footnotes. Half the book is citations. I like that. The only thing is that the tone of the book vacillates between hysterical and flippant. The flippant comments are quite funny sometimes but are a little inappropriate, and the hysterical tone of some of his other statements makes it hard to take him seriously despite his use of footnotes.
I really enjoyed this book. It taught me a lot about cooking, even though I already know a lot about cooking from my readings over the last few years. Its exactly the kind of book I was looking for a few years ago, and I wish I'd had it then.
I really like Kit. She was warm and sweet and very likeable. The main character was solid but not quite as wonderful as kit. The story is great but it is a bit dark. The bad guys are really bad but its nicely contrasted with the good guys being really good.
I know I never finished it but that was only because my library only had it electronically and for some reason it wouldn't work on my kindle and I had to read it on my computer and I hate reading at my computer and eventually it was taken away from me. Still it was a wonderful book.
This has to be one of the best historical romances I've ever read. Of course it takes six books to get there but its such a wonderful story I hardly minded.